<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When free isn&#8217;t good enough: pushing free software authors away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.zerodogg.org/2006/02/15/when-free-isnt-good-enough-pushing-free-software-authors-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.zerodogg.org/2006/02/15/when-free-isnt-good-enough-pushing-free-software-authors-away/</link>
	<description>Geeky comments on geeky things</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zero_Dogg&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why GNA! is better than Savannah</title>
		<link>http://blog.zerodogg.org/2006/02/15/when-free-isnt-good-enough-pushing-free-software-authors-away/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Zero_Dogg&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why GNA! is better than Savannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iamaturtle.org/?p=49#comment-525</guid>
		<description>[...] Then one day I thought about this and well, using a proprietary website to produce and manage a free software project makes&#8230;well&#8230;no sense. So then I started looking at the alternatives. I landed on Savannah. My first Savannah project was GoldenPod. Followed by the (mostly dead) GoldenBackup (no link due to no website nor release, it does have a CVS though). Then followed by the common configuration parser. Then I had my disagreements with Savannah (as some of you might remember). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Then one day I thought about this and well, using a proprietary website to produce and manage a free software project makes&#8230;well&#8230;no sense. So then I started looking at the alternatives. I landed on Savannah. My first Savannah project was GoldenPod. Followed by the (mostly dead) GoldenBackup (no link due to no website nor release, it does have a CVS though). Then followed by the common configuration parser. Then I had my disagreements with Savannah (as some of you might remember). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Wieseler</title>
		<link>http://blog.zerodogg.org/2006/02/15/when-free-isnt-good-enough-pushing-free-software-authors-away/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Wieseler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iamaturtle.org/?p=49#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Did you read the statements of the Debian project because of the GNU FDL and the voting?


Debian accepted the GNU FDL as a free documentation license if your documentation doesn't contain any invariant sections.

So 'Free is good enough' for the Debian project, too.
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you read the statements of the Debian project because of the GNU FDL and the voting?</p>
<p>Debian accepted the GNU FDL as a free documentation license if your documentation doesn&#8217;t contain any invariant sections.</p>
<p>So &#8216;Free is good enough&#8217; for the Debian project, too.<br />
:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Wieseler</title>
		<link>http://blog.zerodogg.org/2006/02/15/when-free-isnt-good-enough-pushing-free-software-authors-away/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Wieseler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iamaturtle.org/?p=49#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Hey, 

I think you missed something here. Sylvain wrote:
"Existing manuals of existing non-GNU packages which are currently licensed under GPL-2-or-later can remain on Savannah with their current licenses"[1]

So it is only valid for NEW {non,}GNU project.


Furthermore Sylvain wrote:
"This policy applies to manuals written in Texinfo, and documentation which ought to be improved into such manuals."[1]

So I guess your "little" documentation doesn't apply to the 'policy change'.


Beside that, Debian didn't post ever a valid resource explaining why the GNU FDL isn't good for them. The resources you pointed out are only from other users... and who cares about Debian? ;-)


[1] https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4303</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, </p>
<p>I think you missed something here. Sylvain wrote:<br />
&#8220;Existing manuals of existing non-GNU packages which are currently licensed under GPL-2-or-later can remain on Savannah with their current licenses&#8221;[1]</p>
<p>So it is only valid for NEW {non,}GNU project.</p>
<p>Furthermore Sylvain wrote:<br />
&#8220;This policy applies to manuals written in Texinfo, and documentation which ought to be improved into such manuals.&#8221;[1]</p>
<p>So I guess your &#8220;little&#8221; documentation doesn&#8217;t apply to the &#8216;policy change&#8217;.</p>
<p>Beside that, Debian didn&#8217;t post ever a valid resource explaining why the GNU FDL isn&#8217;t good for them. The resources you pointed out are only from other users&#8230; and who cares about Debian? ;-)</p>
<p>[1] <a href="https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4303" rel="nofollow">https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4303</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
